Ideas for our Future
Harnessing our joint Knowledge, Skills and Experience to address the big issues and opportunities of our time
A more contentious topic than most we have dealt with so far. So even more important to reinforce the Probably42 personality of Balanced, Impartial, Factual, Respectful and Encouraging and to ensure you cover both pros and cons.
Some of the topics to consider:
Nationalisation
Is Nationalisation of certain industries a good thing in theory?
We have largely moved away from Nationalised industries because they were judged not to work well in practice. What lessons did we learn from this? What are the pros and cons today?
What could be done to make Nationalised Industries work and to tackle the actual and perceived difficulties?
Could Artificial Intelligence and Robotics be used to make them work by taking the human element largely out of the equation?
Unions
What are the pros and cons most often cited for Unions in the way they are currently constituted and operate?
Is it possible to align the interests of employers, unions and society?
Should strikes which affect the general public be illegal?
Is it possible to have a different dispute resolution process other than strikes?
In terms of a discussion about the Unions, I think the basic questions to discuss are, 'Are they a force for good or bad? Did their relevance cease at the end of the Industrial Revolution or maybe in the 1950s/60s? If they're still needed, do they have too much, or too little, power? If we think they need transforming, how can that be achieved?
I think that most of the above is covered in your proposal but I hope I've made some of the points a bit more explicit.
Your final point about nationalisation is contentious because it seems to imply that, if industries are nationalised, we need something to stop the dastardly humans for ruining them and if we don't do something to remove the human element, then they won't work. This implies a bias against nationalised industries before we start the discussion. using AI and robotics could easily be covered under your third point without making it pejorative, because it's more general. so I think you should omit the final point.
Thanks for the input Dave. The point about AI and removing some of the human element was perhaps loosely worded. It was there to indicate that even for those who believe human nature when coupled with a monopoly in private or public sector leads to low motivation to change and progress, might need to revisit their thinking. However I concede that the words could have been better chosen.
How about
Do monopolies inherently lead to less motivation to change and progress, if so what could be done about this? Could Artificial Intelligence and Robotics play a role?
To set the ball rolling, perceived advantages of nationalisation would include
and perceived disadvantages would include
Care to add to this list or disagree with it?
That's a good couple of lists. We could add 'Increased union power' to one of them - but which one?
In terms of nationalisation in general, look at this Guardian article: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/nov/27/privatising-east-coast-rail-rip-off
That's great Bill. I'm happy to talk to you or anyone who wants to form a new Pie and Pint Group on the phone about our experience and give you any hints and tips that I can. Also I'm happy to offer anyone forming a group the opportunity to sit in on one of ours first and/or for me to come along and sit in on their first one, if distance is not too great.
You can view the output of the 'Deep Thought' Pie and Pint discussion group on this topic at http://www.probably42.net/documents/2/24/unions-nationalsiation-pie-and-pint-output
You'll find it includes stats from the ONS (Office of National Statistics), Advantages and Disadvantages of both Unions and Nationalisation and some associated ideas.